Hmm, interesting
I just got chicken and deleted my post about the drug bustees. Unfortunately I'm too fraidy-cat to post anything scandalous on my blog. I noticed on my stat counter that several searches have landed at Wanda Harland by plugging "Auckland drugs" and "celebrity drugs auckland".
How timely my shameless comment farming previous post was.
8 comments:
I always get here by searching on "celebrity drugs auckland". It's easier than remembering a URL.
The consensus among all the innuendo and scuttle on the 'net seems top be that it is the obvious two at the intersection between "ex-sports stars" and "high-profile TV celebrities".
Of course, it's all unconfirmed... until tomorrow morning when the Aussie papers pick up the story and a simple search on Google news will do the trick.
Ah David bless. I feel complimented that you think of me that way.
And Alan, yes. It is obvious eh? But which was dealing in cannabis? And would someone really sue a blog for leaking it? Not that I would. I actually am a hopeful believer in our legal system. And I know I should be more cynical, but you've got to hope eh?
Ah... and yet, I have heard that it is only one of the obvious ones...
I have also had some excellent & completely unreliably information that a number of other household names (I got initials....) were spoken to, but are to be left alone as they are merely consumers...
Wish I was a rich Auckland celeb with my initials being shared about.
So, what are they?
Yeah, what I've heard since must be the same as Llew's. Only one of the two obvious ones are now rumoured to be involved. There's another sporty person, and some high profile others. But probably all crap, of course.
Don't you reckon they would have mentioned another famous sportsperson though? Man, how long will this torture last?
I think my source for the original two was quite good, but you never know.
It certainly would explain the lack of cerebral action on that pairs part ;) (cough - Cheech and Chong)
Post a Comment